Sunday, April 11, 2010

Food For Thought

Here we are again....
Yesterday, after Anly's reply, we wrote about the probability that BoW apologies were not genuine or at least the forum staff used them to make believe that BoW, Mo and Souza could collaborate and every issue between them fell down.
Here our previous post:


Today, we wanna connect the dots.
Here we go..
We read twice her "revelation post" and something caught our attention..

" I hope that we could unite ourselves like we were in the past"

A little sentence full of meaning!

But... Did Mo and Souza collaborate with BoW in the past? IF they did, WHEN? And in WHICH way?
They NEVER collaborated, on the contrary THEY insulted Mo and Souza and MjAlive999.
Let's see some tweets:
DirtyDiana81 ( Gold Forum Admin)

Anly (Gold Forum Admin)



MJGoldWorld (Gold Forum Twitter Account)

We can go on for hours, but those screenshots are enough for explaining that THERE WAS NO cooperation between Souza and Mo.
First they believe that they (Mo&Souza) were involved in the hoax, then ( after BoW change of mind ) they started to offend them.

BUT WHY she wants to collaborate with them IF she has her informer ( and she knows the truth, instead of Mo and Souza who write theories)?

Let's go ahead...

After read her apologies Mo and Souza decided to answer to her via Twitter..
FIRST Mo wrote this:
" Thank you BoW for apologizing to us and admitting you created a mess. Although you didn't apologize to us personally, it did reach us"

THEN Souza wrote this:
" Thank you Daniela for your apologies, it's appreciated. Now let's focus on more important things in this Mad World!"

And NOW we have a million dollar question...
WHY did Anly post on her forum ONLY Souza's Tweet???
We got two possible answers:
a.) She doesn't know that Kyechu on Twitter is Mo.
b.) Mo'tweet is COMPLETELY different from Souza's tweet. She thanked BoW for her apologies BUT she underlined that BoW created a HUGE mess! So Anly didn't like that blame on BoW and she chose to show to her members ONLY the good stuff.

We know the correct answer because Anly KNOWS that Kyechu is Mo on Twitter:


Anly asked Mo if she can send her a DM, so that means " Mo please follow me!"

But let's see what Mo answered to her:


Anly, are you writing a novel? or have you written the wrong email address because Mo hasn't received the email yet and she is still waiting!

So Anly wanted to deceive her members twisting Souza's tweet.

We have an example that support our theory.
Let's take a look of what a forum member wrote today.

"... Souza and BoW were about to reconcile..."

SO is THIS their aim??
Are they insinuating something?
Are they twisting Souza's words, into something that THEY want show??
In our opinion YES, that's why Anly chose Souza's tweet instead of Mo's one that clearly explained what Mo thinks about BoW..

But, what do Mo and Souza think about this situation?
Let's see some tweets:

" Let me make something VERY clear; despite BoW's apologies to us, there never has and there never will be any cooperation between BoW and Souza & me. The forum posts insinuating a collaboration are nothing more than a continuance of the BoW deception"

AND:

" Oh let them blab if it makes them happy, but I wanted to point out that those apologies were just made in order to start a new deception. Funny eh, how Anly only used Souza's tweet thanking BoW for apologizing in her post, but not mine. she tried to make it appear as if Souza's tweet insinuated something else than Souza meant. That she could not do with my tweet as mine showed PERFECTLY clear how I think about BoW"


That's what we think.. what Souza and Mo think and what the Gold Forum thinks...
Do some maths and enjoy yourselves with the result.

18 comments:

  1. MMMMM...interessante! A quanto pare le provano tutte! Ma mi hanno insegnato che le bugie hanno le gambe corte, in questo caso cortissime! Vogliono far proprio far sembrare che Mo & Souza in passato avessero collaborato con questa Black e che a causa di chissà quale incomprensione questa collaborazione sia finita. Poi Black indossando il velo dell'umiltà che la rende la fonte di ogni bontà chiede anche di ricostruire questa collaborazione. E i pesci abboccano!
    Io ricordo bene invece il duro lavoro di Black e compagnia bella per screditare quelle 2 ragazze, ricordo bene che per mesi ha deriso le loro teorie, ma sempre con umiltà è, ricordo quante volte ha scritto che le loro storie fossero assurde, ricordo che non ha perso occasione per farle passare come persone fuori di testa.
    Ora chiede la loro collaborazione, ma non apertemente e ammettendo che lei di questa hoax non ci ha capito un emerito cacchio, ma passando per la persona buona e caritatevole.
    Mo & Souza si sono sobbarcate giornate e nottate di letture al pc per arrivare alle conclusione che una quaquaraquà screditava con sarcasmo.

    Questa è l'ennesima pensata di una mente vogliosa solo di consensi. E questo è molto triste...pensare che esistano persone che pur di stare nelle grazie della gente siano capaci di modellare la realtà a loro piacimento. Io ero disposta a perdonare Black, perchè credevo volesse seriamente rimediare alle sue misfatte, ma mi rendo conto che ancora una volta le sue mosse e le sue parole erano studiate a tavolino. E questo è disgustoso.

    Olimpia

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bè...sarebbe anche l'ora che si capisse.

    BoW ah il potere che ha anche perchè è ben spalleggiata.
    Malafede la sua,peggiore quella delle Admin.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Non credo che Bow con quel "spero che in futuro si possa avere quell'unione che avevamo un tempo"intendesse dire che in passato ha avuto una collaborazione con Mo e Souza,ma si riferisse a quando ancora tutti seguivamo Mo e Souza,prima che si creasse quel quiproquò di chi seguire e chi non.Dopo quel giorno qualcuno decise chi seguire o meno,e qualcuno si cancellò da follower di Mo e di Souza...ecco secondo me l'unione che avevamo un tempo è riferita a tutti,a quando tutti seguivamo Mo,Souza e anche MjAlive999, a quando ancora non si erano create queste serie di discussioni.Non credo che si voglia far intendere che BoW abbia avuto collaborazioni con questi due contatti.
    Giuliettalove

    ReplyDelete
  4. Bhè, a questo punto si potrebbe arrivare a pensare anche ad un'altra cosa.
    BoW stava perdendo colpi, troppe rivelazioni sul suo conto tutte insieme e che cosa fare per non farla affondare completamente?
    Decidere di cambiare tattica (almeno per un pò)...
    Prima di tutto farla passare come la vittima di turno (messaggio di Anly seguito da quello di BoW)
    Poi cercare di renderla più popolare (F.I.B FanClub)
    E di nuovo via con le domande...
    Devo dire che una ne fanno e 100 ne pensano su quel forum...

    ReplyDelete
  5. ...ma quel "F.I.B." và spiegato bene,che rende l'idea: Fiducia Incondizionata a Bow !
    Direi che parla da solo.

    ReplyDelete
  6. the "FIB" new logo is a proof of the BOW failure ...

    If Bow was not discredit they don't need to use this logo ...

    It's another good news ....

    afriend

    ReplyDelete
  7. @afriend
    I don't think it is good news, indeed, have joined forces even more, we have a new HOLY
    S. BOW
    That sadness ....

    ReplyDelete
  8. lol ... Holy S BOW ....
    Very funny ....
    The problem is she didn't make miracle ...
    Create an imaginary informator is maybe a miracle ... lol

    Be patient she will be return to simple human being the 26th june 2010 ....

    People are strange and that's why that some of followers will continue to believe the 26th june is nothing happens ....

    amen

    afriend ...

    ReplyDelete
  9. ah aha ahahah
    LOL a friend you makes me laugh
    Sarah

    ReplyDelete
  10. @ afriend
    I saw that BOW has never responded to any of your questions ... maybe you're not a believer? joke, doesn't matter ... but Michael will return ...
    HOLY BOW FOREVER .... LOL

    ReplyDelete
  11. I can say that afriend is a believer! But it's important to say that no matter what you believe or not, but try to understand only using your brain and not others!! Follow everything you see, you listen and you hear...
    You can believe without any trouble only in God!
    EntaJackson

    ReplyDelete
  12. if i'am believer ????
    I don't have the pretension to say I have the truth ....
    I'm honest so i say i don't know if MJ is alive or not .

    i did my investigations like everybody and i have my theory too ...

    I'm not sure that Santa BOW will save all her followers ;)

    PS : I have no anwer from BOW but from followers too ...

    I asked them to found the text of law who permit in the USA to fake your death but you must be back before one year.

    1° BOW says this law exists and that's why MJ will be back before the 25th of june but never show it !
    2° Follower believe in her but they found no trace of this law !!!!

    I don't know if it's a miracle but it seems ....

    Amen


    @friend ....

    ReplyDelete
  13. @dear afriend I SEARCH 4 that law too..BUT i didn't find it..i read different the californian costitution and law..MY GOD!!
    BUT about come back in a year from fake death NO TRACE

    brilly

    ReplyDelete
  14. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JdD5oA4rDSo&translated=1
    Try with this you tube video
    i don't know if it is trustable or not but he talks about the law in the USA
    you mother tongue can understand better than me
    Bye Sarah

    ReplyDelete
  15. Ciao, non so se mi è consentito postare dei link qui sul blog. In ogni caso, riguardo alla simulazione della propria morte ho letto cose che potrebbero essere interessanti su ask(dot)metafilter(dot)com. Cercando "fake one's death" ci sono delle risposte. Grazie

    ReplyDelete
  16. Riguardo al video..
    Il ragazzo ha detto che è illegale falsificare tua morte in USA.Se Mike riappare in USA sarà arrestato, ma non se apparirà in un altro paese.
    Veramente qui ci vuole un legale americano che conosce veramente le leggi. Su internet non ci si può fidare più di tanto

    ReplyDelete
  17. Ed FBI e CIA dovrebbero essere correi di un crimine ....... mah!!!!!
    Oppure anche in America si preparano a fare leggi "ad personam" .......

    ReplyDelete
  18. we are agree brilly
    As usual BOW pretends news without evidence ...
    It's a shame .
    ;)

    afriend

    ReplyDelete