Wednesday, March 17, 2010




Who is BoW?

Let's try to understand it from her own words. "I don't call myself an informer, I'm just a girl who adore MJ and who's helping to clarify the many doubts born in these 8 months".

Fine.So to say...'Cause she always claimed she has a source very close to Michael Jackson, giving out this source is a MJ's relative, one of his brothers, a male one. Hmm..

"Is it your source someone famous?Do we know him?"- Answering to this question, she tells : "Famous enough, but I can't tell you more" I can only imagine how happy a member of the Jackson family could be, hearing her saying "Famous enough", while he had been thinking for 40 years to be known all over the world. But fine, let's go ahead...

What she writes should be specific information , with no changes at all, because she has such a direct source.
Let's see her last statements:

February 6th:
"Death was not mentioned at the Grammys...they used words such as 'deceased', 'gone', but they never used the word 'dead'
At this point a forum member notices Lionel Ritchie used the word 'dead'...
Then:
What is important is that no one used it while the children were accepting the award"

"When Michael chose the song 'This is it ' he noticed the title could be spelled backwards. Then he decided to analyse the entire song"
Why on earth Michael had to analyse the lyrics of a song HE wrote 19 years ago? I think he knew what he wrote, he didn't need to analyse anything!

February 13th:
"Unconfirmed rumors tell Johnny Depp would like to play MJ role in a boigraphical movie"
But a forum member tells it's not true. Johhny Depp stated in an interview "Only Mj can play the role of MJ".
Then BOW changes her mind: "yes, the news has been denied, I just wanted you to notice the connection with Mr Depp"

Now let's talk about people on the web Bow advises to follow.

February 15th:
"Liz Taylor, K.Ortega, Dove...MJalive999, Souza and others are related to the hoax...they are legit"
February 23rd:
"I respect Souza very much"
And on the same day, to a member who asks if Souza And Mo know about what's happening, she answers:
"More than you can imagine".
on March 1st on the list of twitter accounts we should follow there are:
"Comeback777, Karen Faye, Kenny Ortega, The Jacksons...Souza81 " while we should NOT follow: Ch_J, midnightmlk, MJalive999"
Why shouldn't we follow Ch_J and MJalive999 anymore?She told us to follow them since months!
Perhaps this is the reason: Ch_J: "BOW who claims to know who I am is a liar...She's lying and not only about me"

Later BOW: " MJalive999 is a fake, he doesn't know anything about the hoax...Do not follow Souza81 anymore, she deceived me, she made me believe she knows, but she's neither a MJ's fan.She knows him since few months,she is just interested on this story. She doesn't know him enough indeed". And again: " I just knew about Souza yesterday night from my source" To excuse herself : " I had been told the collaborators who work on the web knew about the hoax, but I had not been informed about their names, so I told you to follow him (midnightmlk) and others. Now It's clear there are many fakes." It's a case of the pot calling the kettle black.

She hadn't been informed about the names...So,she based her statements on what? Just on her assumption.
Ts writes on his last update: "A huge thank you to Souza and Mo for your hard work in providing this forum, and also your own research.Don't worry about the fact that people criticize you for not being MJ fans.You are doing for Michael Jackson what millions of fans are not doing"
Again, about Ch_J : "Ch_J is fake"
Later: "How could you tell I'm a fake? The only thing I'm asking for is to respect each other". Ok, so how could she tell Souza81 and Ch_J are fake? Where is her respect?
Let's see : "Souza81 and midnightmlk are not legit, MJalive999 and Ch_J are fake"

March 3rd : "Mjalive999 changed my message.She drew a red line on the names making you understand a different meaning"
MJalive999 intervened and proved the message had not been changed at all.So : "I'm sorry MJalive999, let's forget it, I will not talk about you anymore" adding : " Who knows the truth?Only Michael.How could we judge who is legit and who is fake? I have been asked if the twitter accounts were legit and so I answered."

The reason someone is not legit anymore for BOW is clear now. It's also clear there is no source who informs her on who to follow.
If you want to be on the good list, don't talk about her or, at least, don't call her a liar.

Let's talk about the key of this hoax now. There's a bit of confusion here too.

February 27th : " Germany is the key...investigate, go into it"
February 18th : Germany is the key"
On February 27th she begins to be a bit confused : " I wrote in some previous post Germany, Jermaine is the key. It's him"
March 1st: "Days ago I told you Jermaine is the key.That's it: The twitter account is managed by Jermaine"
March 5th : "Germany is not involved in the hoax. The key is Jermaine"

I want to make it clear to BOW that Germany is a nation and Jermaine is the name of one of MJ's brothers.

What about the song 'We are the world-for Haiti' ?

On February 16th someone asks her if the song has been recorded at Neverland. BOW answers: "Yes" and on February 19th she adds : "Neverland is the only place".
On February 23th she writes: "Many claim WATW for HAiti has been recorded at Hanson Studios in Hollywood. It's not true and no one will ever tell the opposite, they can't do it" and again :" WATW for HAiti: in the and the place where it has been recorded will be revealed"

If no one can tell which place it is, because it will be revealed in the end, why on earth SHE can do it????

Few months after June 25th many people on the web thought the hoax was created to solve Michael's financial debt...It's not true!
In the beginning Bow told us this was the case, then she changed her mind and claimed: "Michael didn't have any financial debts anymore". But just one month ago: "He didn't have considerable debts forcing him to escape", letting us understand that Michael had some considerable debts years ago and some of them are still present. ( he din't have CONSIDERABLE debts), so other debts still persist.

And BOW has few information about MJ life before June 25th. Telling us she has total respect for Souza, she writes more than once this sarcastic statement: "Michael has not a living twin, God rest his soul". Again: "Michael had a twin who died by birth" And : "There was a rumor about a MJ twin and they alternated during the years".

In the last sentence she treats one of Souza's post ironically. In that post Souza told us her theory, even if she never claimed to know the truth. Minutes later a member noticed that the dead bay was Marlon's twin, not Michael's.
So BOW writes: "Yes, I'm sorry.I was talking about Brandon, Marlon's brother, the only Jackson baby dead by birth".

She doesn't know much also about MJ discography. As a matter of fact, she writes on February 17th: "Lanny Kravitz song is important.Not the one of 2001, but I'm talning about the brand new one in which he duets with Michael".
Let's make it clear: that song is from 2004; it's called "Storm" and it's part of the album "Baptist".
On the other hand, the duet is from 2001. "Another day" is indeed an outtake from "Invincible".

Let's go ahead and talk about Sanremo, the most important tv festival of Italian music. According to BOW, even there they "talked" about her.
She was asked if there would have been some clues related to the hoax during the night when Travis Payne and two dancers from TII would have been there performing.
"Clues?Not many" and "No relevant clues". After the show a member asked if the picture taken from the Black or White video which appeared on the screen had some kind of meaning. She answered: " At Sanremo festival the picture I use as a avatar appeared...Draw your own conclusion." and also : "That picture was at Sanremo for a reason", claiming it was a clue. So also Sanremo is interested in her???

About Debbie Rowe, MJ second wife and mother of his first two sons.
On March 4th she writes: "Michael would never let the mother of those beautiful kids suffer". Then, another change on the same day:
"Debbie is taking advantage of this story" and : "Debbie waived the custody of the children for money...no comment". The day after:
"Debbie takes advantage of the situation". At this point I ask myself who is she to JUDGE a woman who never met.

Few days ago an Italian tv channel talked about Michael. Before the show was on a member asked her if she knew what the show was about. This is her answer: " A documentary which will talk about him in a good way, about his story...It will be remembered the Genius"
Again, Wrong forecast, because it was just a brief interview to Rabbi Schmuley Boteach, according to BOW ' a person in search of publicity'.
She invited us to do not trust what he had to say. The documentary didn't show the artistic side of Michael, but Rabbi Schmuley remebered him as a human being.
Wrong forecast also regarding TII special features (dvd/blueray).
Before TII was out in Italy she was asked if there would be found some scenes of the burial or some ones after that. Her answer was: "You'll find something"

After watching the dvd, we can strongly say it's not like that at all.
I have doubt this girl tries to anticipate some news after reading some opinions on many hoax believers Italian forums to report them then as if the news is brand new.

But when she can't find the answers to the questions the members ask her on the web, then it's the same old story : "Sorry, I can't talk about it"
As it happened to the little green man in the WATW for Haiti video. She told : "That man is for something I can't talk about".

To validate my Hypothesis, let's take another example.

About the Tribute which is supposed to be in June 2010. Suddenly the members began to ask questions about the date and how it will work, and particularly if THAT will be BAMSDAY.

Let's see some of her answers:

March 6th: "The tribute will be presented on June 8th and it will be aired worldwide on June 25th. There are good probabilities for BAMSDAY on that day"

March 7th: "The tribute won't be recorded on June 8th, if it will be a tribute.If will be presented on June 8th and it will be on air worldwide on June 25th"

March 9th: "The show won't be live, too dangerous to have a public that day, both for fans and Michael" and she adds: "I just got it confirmed, I didn't understand as usual . The tribute will be recorded on June 8th and the fans will be there."
And she says that for all the fans who won't be so lucky to be there, there will be a DVD to watch BAMSDAY.
At this point many questions arise - If the tribute will be recorded on June 8th with the fans attending it (we know how huge the Wembley arena is ) ALL the world will know Michael is alive before June 25th...or will they keep it secret?
So, another change: "Before I post something wrong, I will ask more about this news" and " I can only tell you this about the tribute: London, June 8th at the moment. Anyway, it's still a developing story. To be sure it will happen, a tickets presale has to start. It's not me who changes the version, it's the news I receive." Oh, yes...sure!!

About the announced dvd she adds : " A dvd?For now I don't think so".

Do you need a further example?

On some hoax believers forums it has been said that when the Jacksons talk about Jack Pack , they' re referring to Michael.
"Jack Pack is him" , " Jack Pack is Michael" and " I've been the first on the web to claim Jack PAck is Michael".
Then we come to the truth...so she changes her mind again: "Jack Pack is a group of fans on twitter".
For those who asked the reason of this change of mind, she answers : "In the beginning, when the Jacksons wrote about Jack PAck, they were referring to Michael. For real."

Another example: A member asked her if the white shirt with the lion on it , which Michael wore in TII, was the same shirt Jermaine wore during the UCla Medical Center press. She answered with a total unnecessary explanation of the symbols related to the lion, omitting the real question.

WHO IS BLACK OR WHITE _PART II_


Let's see the differences between wHat Bow said and wHat TS said: ( without changes of mind).
Let's start to see what BOW thinks about what TS writes:

February 6th: "TIAI will be with you until the end"
February 7th: "TIAI wrote a brilliant and well structured post"
"I agree with TS on many things"
February 13th: "I agree with TS"
March 3rd : "TS distracted few times"
"TS distracted only in the beginning"
MArch 7th: "Analyse TS redirection"
March 10th : "The hoax revealed thanks to TS"
MArch 12th: "TIAI is a kind of guide"

Few days ago TS gave us another update and destroyed ALL the affermations made by BOW in the last weeks, who suddenly changes the story on the role played by TS : TS is diverting again" and "TS has to tell this story, because it has to be like that".
This is her answer to who asked her why what she stated is completely different from what TS wrote.

It's a pity that in the last days she wrote "Follow the hoax an TIAI in March". I want to point out tHat during the month of March she didn't anticipate anything. Ts wrote tHat before the 9th of March there wouldn't be any news, letting us assume we had to wait after the 9th for news.
So, let's see what doesn't match in what she wrote compared to TS:


BOW:February 7th: Michael signed a contract with AEG for playing gigs at the o2 arena"
February 19th: Michael wanted to play gigs at the o2, he wanted to go back on stage, he wanted to please his fans.."
TS: " RP said Mj last day of rehearsal said: " thanks for helping me go tHis far, I can manage from now on" It was a strange thing to say. it's weird to say the least, it'd make sense only if he had already planned to fake his death the day after

(He wouldn't play any concerts if he faked his death.)

BOW:February 13th: the 911 call has been recorded
TS:" the call arrived at 12.21 and 4 secs as you can see by the ambulance pc screen... emergency utilities keep record of the time of every calls, hour, minute and second.
(the phone call wasn't previously recorded but it's been made at thaT particular time)

BOW:
1st of March: after Lady D's death he postponed one of his concerts from the 31th of Aug to the 3rd of Sep..another clue"
TS: if you looked at the moon with the naked eye on September 3 (night of the burial): it looked full. Do you remember seeing the full moon in Thriller—both the original version {http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sOnqjkJTMaA, at 2:10}, and also in the TII version {TII DVD, at 59:19, 59:37, etc}?
Speaking of the burial: why was it delayed for sooooooo loooooooooooooong????? Even the memorial on July 7, less than two weeks after the death, seemed like a little long; but why did it take more than TWO MONTHS for the burial? And remember, after waiting forever for the burial, it was finally planned for MJ’s birthday: Saturday, August 29
But then the burial was “pushed to [Monday] August 31, because there are things the family needs to get in order before Michael is laid to rest.”
What? After more than two months, the family still needed more time??
Then it had to be pushed back again: “... August 31 -- became problematic because of schools re-opening on that day.”
So they had the burial on Tuesday, September 1? Or Wednesday, September 2? No! I guess school re-opened for three days in a row that year! And if they did not want to do it on a school day at all: then why not Friday evening or Saturday—the previous plan for burial on MJ’s birthday would have been on a Saturday, remember (August 29)?

And if MJ was really dead, but for whatever reason the family wanted his burial to be on a full moon: then why didn’t they have it on Friday, September 4? There is one very clear reason for all of these things: it’s 7 days (inclusive) from 9-3-09 to 9-9-09!

TS fully explains the reason why the 3rd of sep was chosen, there's no link with Diana's death at all.

BOW: 27 feb: Moonwalker the movie was filmed many years ago, there aren't links to the hoax, not many.
12 March: the escape was planned after the o2 press conference..in few months; after the 25th of June the plan has been built day by day. Nothing was planned years before."
March 13th:"He didn't planned the hoax years before"

(If Michael hasn' been planning the hoax for years it'd be impossible to explain all the coincidences we found out. By writing in Moonwalker there aren't many clues we can assume tHat there still are some).
BOW:
25th of Feb : they aren't involved, they are just an example (NWO and Illuminati)
26th of Feb: Illuminati and NWO aren't involved in the hoax
3rd of MArch: Illuminati and NOW are not involved, there's something worse

TS:
it very clearly shows one of the main reasons for the hoax: to turn the 666 NWO upside down, 999!

(TS wrote about NWO and Illuminati several times, redirecting to videos and articles to demostrate their existence)

BOW:
4th of MArch: "You see blue, red and white fireworks.Those are Michael's favourite colors"

5th of March: "It's about the end and Bamsday"(answering to "What about the fireworks posted by TS?)

TS:

And did you notice the fireworks in V for Vendetta? Well, you can also see fireworks in the TII DVD—both on stage, just before Light Man, and also projected in the video shown during Light Man {http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GooyC24NOdY; http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/mpd/permalink/m10VO3DPICBZT5}. Furthermore, you can see very obvious red, white, and blue on Light Man immediately before the fireworks. Anyone from the USA will instantly know that these colors are unquestionably linked to the fourth of July, known as Independence Day

(One of TIAI redirects was about a pic with blue, red and white fireworks in it, clearly referring to Independence Day. I don't think it was referred to Michael's chromatic preferences,nor to Bamsday)

BOW: "In 1988 MICHAEL HAD STARTED SIGNIGN AUTOGRAPHS WITH THE WRITING 1998, BECAUSE HE WANTED TO CLOSE AN ERA WITHIN THAT DECADE.
HE WANTED TO GET MARRIED AND HAVE CHILDREN BEFORE 1998.Those are not three 6, but three circles
THE ARROW IS A POINTER, SAYING: KEEP MOVING.
MORE CATHOLIC SYMBOLS."
"1998, 3 circles,arrow and then a 4"
"Think again about that photo , there are 3 circles .... then a phase that is almost to the end ...."
"there is a 4 .... the fourth month of the year is April
there are 3 circles .... 3, Then we have 10. April 3, 2010. this is the point"
"he was signing autographs, because of a strange prophecy, in fact after 98 he has stopped.
But certainly he do not thought about faking his death."
8th of MArch:
"Those are three circles, not three 6, even TS tells it."

TS:
Some have thought that one or more of the vertical digits in the Dangerous autograph are zeros, not sixes; however, the top two digits are much closer to a six than a zero—and even the bottom digit has a small hook if you look carefully. MJ is not careless, and he was not writing sloppy zeros; in fact, notice that if anything, his zeros have a gap on the top—not an overlap and hook. So it’s three sixes, just written so that it would not be very obvious—both because it is a code, and also because 666 might scare some people if they didn’t realize the purpose for it in this context.

(Bow claims the numbers and symbols in the autograph lead to a date: April 3rd 2010. A member askes her: "So MJ was thinking to the hoax yet in 1998" Then, MJ message in the autograph becomes a strange prophecy, according to her)

Let's go back for a while. BOW always claimed there is no message, nor a mission behind the hoax. It was planned to save himself, his family and the fans.
But...

BOW:
20th of February: "The reason underlying Michael’s disappearance is very serious, although other reasons also exist. Michael intends to show something, get his message through."

25th of February: After writing a long post about NWO: " Michael only sent us a message, he makes us understand what kind of world are we living in, there’s much more."

26th of February: "HE DID NOT ESCAPE TO LAUNCH A MESSAGE, HE DISAPPEARED FOR HIS PERSONAL SAFETY AND TO PROTECT HIS FAMILY AND FANS."
5th of March: " THAT MESSAGE THAT ALL WE ARE TRYING TO DISTRIBUTE NOW, HE TRASMITTED it throughout his life ... NOT ONLY NOW THROUGH TS."
And to the ones who ask who are those dangerous people and organizations she answers :
"Who threatened Michael is invisible,they are detached organizations"
What does it mean??? Invisible?? Michael was threatened by something invisible!
And to the ones who ask' what can we do to fight the NWO' she tells : " Do you think YOU can fight it?, descouraging every attempt to oppose it.

Plus, she writes in a post: "
"THE PHOENIX IS HIM, MICHAEL WHO IS REBORN FROM HIS ASHES.
THE EYE WE SEE AS THE SYMBOL OF ILLUMINATI IS NOTHING BUT THE PHOENIX EYE.
THE PHOENIX IS BORN AGAIN, HE IS THE LIGHT OF THE WORLD… DO YOU REMEMBER THIS IS IT?
“I’M THE LIGHT OF THE WORLD”
AND THEN THE ENLIGHTENED , THAT IS ALL OF US.", comparing Michael and us to the Illuminati.
When some shocked member ask for some explanations, she writes: "I was referring to Enlightenment (literature)", which has not an eye as its symbol. This was just an attempt to correct her mistake.

Her purpose is to focus the attention on her and she arleady did it with all the Sanremo stuff.Moreover, she writes: "The Jacksons and Michael's friends read the forums and websites. If they didn't contradict me, there is a reason." "What I write is what I can tell you" or maybe is it just what she can find on the hoax forums?

BOW clears up her role: "I'm a friend" , "You'll understand the truth bit by bit." " I can only show you the way" and "I can write on the web..I'm writing in a forum where I was invited to write"

Invited??? But wasn't she who wanted to help people to find the truth? Wasn't it her own choice?
Now we're told she was invited. Does she want us to understand there is some kind of connection between her and the forum admin? It seem so. The both of them always have the same opinions. And the same will to discredit TS when he writes something different from BOW's words

Let's see what the Admin writes:
"Black Hello, I ask you a question about TIAI and particularly the last two update.
I stayed really "shocked" by what I read:
MJ, for years and years was studying this hoax and among the many reasons there was to break the record of Thriller ...???
I understand the desire of make us aware of a reality unknown to us before then ... but talking about earthquakes caused by man, alarming everyone on a "hypothetical" end of the world seems to be very, very exaggerated.
And then ... I do not really see Michael behind all this ....
I think with the last two update the TIAI has really exaggerated ...
I so feel that it is precisely the TIAI to implement the "mind control".
What do you think about it?"
One thing BOW said is right for sure. She wrote it on March 8th:
You are my fairy dust that makes me fly high.

6 comments:

  1. Aspetto quel giorno...il BAM's day.
    Sarà il giorno più felice per me e per tutti. Rivedere Michael, ascoltarlo mentre parla, rivedere il suo sorriso, le sue emozioni.
    Ma aspetto anche i giorni successivi al BAM, il giorno in cui sarà rivelato tutto (come mi auguro).
    Allora ci saranno tanti utenti che negheranno di aver scritto questi topic e lasciato commenti qui e altrove, contro una persona che proprio non conoscete. Solo allora mi toglierò finalmente quel fastidioso sassolino nella scarpa che mi procura tanto fastidio.
    Non è desiderio di vendetta. Non è un sentimento da fan di Michael, ed io mi considero vera fan di Michael Jackson.
    E non verrò neanche qui a dirvi "Ve lo avevo detto"...
    Vorrei solo che vi insegnasse a non giudicare cosi tanto pesantemente una persona (e anche un gruppo di persone), ancora una volta, commettendo lo stesso errore che è stato fatto su di lui.
    Non credetele, ma astenetevi dal giudicarla. Un giorno, non molto lontano, sarà fatta luce anche sull'utente BlackorWhite.
    It's All for Love.

    Anly

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ciao Anly,
    scusa..ma ancora una volta non ci siamo capiti.
    Su questo blog non si giudica l'utente Black or White come persona, perchè nessuno la conosce.Oltre ad essere poco rispettoso, non avrebbe neppure senso.
    Non c'è bisogno di di prenderla sul personale, perchè non è così.
    Sono le cose che ha scritto a non quadrare.
    Siamo tutti believers e nessuno negherà di aver scritto nulla, non preoccuparti.
    E non c'è bisogno che BOW ci insegni nulla, perchè anche lei non conosce chi la critica.
    Mettere in luce le sue contraddizioni, qualora le cose che afferma fossero false, potrebbe anch'esso essere un atto di amore.
    E sono sicura che se BOW conosce davvero la verità (ha detto più volte che le critiche a ciò che dice non sono importanti, perchè tanto la storia deve andare così), sarà anche soddisfatta che ci sia gente che pensi un po' più con la propria testa, invece di pendere solamente dalle sue labbra, visto che lei riferisce solo ciò che può riferire.
    Se Michael ha inscenato la propria morte, bisognerebbe capirne il motivo, più che focalizzarsi su QUANDO tornerà .
    Perchè se fosse solo questo, io al posto suo me ne resterei nascosto.
    Non prenderlo come un attacco a te, Anly, capisci che è difficile comprendersi attraverso uno schermo.
    Il fatto è che non sono una ragazzina, sono in grado di ragionare e non ho contatti con BOW come li hai tu.
    Se tu hai delle prove schiaccianti che BOW dica il vero, buon per te.
    Però, renditi conto che chi recepisce solo ciò che appare in superficie, può anche avere una visione totalmente diversa.
    Non mi sembra una cosa così inverosimile o crudele.

    ReplyDelete
  3. ci sono tanti falsi in giro,che dicono cazzate,ma voi attaccate solo BOW.
    per me siete una massa si invidiosi

    ReplyDelete
  4. e non solo
    non avete mai cercato de capi niente su de lei e quello che dice,e se molti su gold sono stati bannati è stato solo perchè offensivi.
    ma sapete quanti utenti non credono a BOW e stanno sul sito civilmente? ma voi capite la parola civili?
    l'avete sempre attaccata.
    dialogo
    bah!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Ho letto tutti i commenti di questa pagina e onestamente ci sono cose che non capisco.
    Facciamo il gioco della bilancia a 2 piatti: su uno ci mettiamo BoW come persona gentile, disponibile, mai irascibile, sempre presente, che AIUTA COME PUO', che ha dimostrato di saper tener testa a tutti sempre con intelligenza. Sull'altro piatto ci mettiamo una serie di inesattezze e contraddizioni, un'altra serie di previsioni succesivamente riscontrate ed un'altra serie di cose dette in contemporanea con altri "informatori" della hoax.
    Beh la bilancia è praticamente in equilibrio.
    Ciò non toglie che, sebbene Anly abbia un rapporto preferenziale con BoW, è innegabile che chi legge e si informa sulle rivelazioni di Black (senza sapere nulla di lei) debba pensare e metabolizzare le informazioni con la propria testa: questo è quello che Michael vuole! E' quello che anche io faccio. Ammiro BoW come persona...ma qualche perplessità su certe informazioni,ce le ho.
    Come amministratrice di un altro forum di believers, ho aperto una sezione su Bow, riportando le cose che puntualmente ci comunica, ma per "dovere di cronaca", evidenzio su altro topic le discrepanze e le contraddizioni. Senza aggiungere commenti. Ogni perdona DEVE pensare con la sua testa.
    Non mi piace leggere attacchi diretti e maleducati a BoW, sia perchè nessuno è colpevole fino a che non si prova matematicamente la sua colpa, sia perchè l'educazione e la gentilezza di Bow non merita aggressioni come quelle che talvolta ho letto.
    Si siamo tutti believers, ma onestamente ora che il BAM è così vicino, ora che Michael sta per rivelare i motivi di questa hoax, dovremmo deporre le armi e creare il clima giusto per accoglierlo.
    Est modus in rebus: dobbiamo ragionare, analizzare, approfondire con la nostra testa....senza certezze, Anly, non si può pretendere il proselitismo! E' d'obbligo invece l'educazione ed il rispetto nei confronti di BoW come persona.
    Quando tutto sarà finito ed i dubbi verranno sciolti, ognuno di noi farà mente locale su tutto il percorso fatto dal 25 giugno al BAM, e darà a Cesare ciò che è di Cesare.
    Non facciamo che tutto quello che Michael ha fatto per Amore, risulti inutile.
    Sandy Jackson

    ReplyDelete
  6. Occhio, su un punto di sbagli Sandy, anche BoW ha offeso diverse persone ;)

    ReplyDelete